All submitted papers are subject to double-blind review process by at least two international reviewers that are experts in the area of the paper.
The factors that are taken into account in review are relevance, significance, originality, readability and language.
The possible decisions include acceptance or rejection.
Articles may be rejected without review if they are obviously not suitable for publication.
Any act which are regarded as plagiarism will not be tolerated. Please check http://www.ieee.org/documents/Level_description.pdf document for Plagiarism Levels and Corrective Actions, as taken from Section 8.2.4.D of the PSPB Operations Manual.
Important Note: Before submitting your paper please perform plagiarism check. The author(s) must check his/her full paper(s) using a plagiarism tool (i.e., itenthicate) for plagiarism control. All papers will be submitted to IEEE Cross Check before reviewing process and submitting them to IEEE Xplore for publication. Papers that do not conform IEEE’s publication policies will not be sent to reviewers and/or IEEE Xplore for publication even if they were presented at the conference!
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.
A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.
Submitting the same manuscript to more than one publication concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported work.
All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed
The reviewers evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.
Manuscripts received for review are treated as confidential documents and are reviewed by anonymous staff.
The staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.
Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.
A reviewer should also call to Congress chair’s attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.